Skip to main content
I've just had a very enlightening discussion with Mr. David Brin, read many of his posts on his blog: http://open.salon.com/blog/david_brin, and a few that he directed me to.

The outcome of which is a little piece of introspection. Mr. Brin correctly points out that the chief ideological divide of our time is not truly Left/Right Liberal/Conservative or really any sort of "political" split at all.

It is rather more precisely a forward/backwards split. It is the divide between walking forward into the future, or running screaming into a never existent "golden era" of a romanticized past. It's the divide between advancing into a uncomfortable future, or demanding we retreat to a mythological "safe womb".  It's the divide between GO and STOP. Between pressing the gas and slamming on the breaks.

I believe in ecological sustainability, but I refuse to support the AGW movement.  Why? Because to me, far too much of the AGW dogma is "STOP!!!!!!".  It's not about FIXING the problem, it's about running away from the problem at top speed by banning carbon emissions, and thus FORCING the world to go back to a "better, more primitive" time that exists only in the collective imaginations of those pining for them. A better solution must be found, and I don't see any signs that one is being seriously looked for. The other side is screaming "STOP!!!!!" just as loudly, but they are pining for the "good old days" before we KNEW THERE WAS A PROBLEM, and little more.Neither side is looking for "progress", only retreat, and any real suggestions for alternate solutions, such as geoengineering, are demonized.

Our world is advancing. It is doing so at an ever faster rate, and those advances are creeping out into society more and more openly. Everything we thought we knew is proving to be just a tiny splash in the potential total of all things knowable, and all the old "certainties" are growing ever shakier. That "steady job" that lasted a lifetime is now one that changes every few years. That "rock solid" certainty we once had, that comforting "wisdom" of knowing "how the world works" is growing more and more tenuous, fading away like a wisp of cloud.

Even in MMOs, we wax Nostalgic, recreating fantasy pasts that never were for our entertainment, looking for that magic we know was never there, and the safety of knowing all that "change" is far away.

But we don't have a choice but to move forward. In our hearts we know that there was never a "golden age" behind us. We've been there, and done that. It's time to stop looking back at a romantic dream, and time to look forward to making that dream better, and to make a future "golden age" with our own hands.

So, this November, don't vote "dem" or "rep" "pro" or "con". Vote for those looking forwards instead of for those who are only looking back.

Comments

  1. This is reminiscent of Homo neophilus and Homo neophobus as described in the Illuminatus! trilogy. Maybe it's something in the tomato juice.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here we are in 2012, looking to elect a new president, or keep the one we have. "So, this November, don't vote "dem" or "rep" "pro" or "con". Vote for those looking forwards instead of for those who are only looking back."

    Wise words in any election year.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

As you know, I have friends all across the political spectrum, some of whom are liberal, some of whom are conservative. Sometimes, they call me names because I express viewpoints that they find objectionable. Note that I am including both sides in that statement, and not addressing it at either side specifically. To be blunt, I find it mildly amusing that simply stating a conclusion I have personally drawn based on observation and evidence can generally provoke extreme responses from all sides depending on whether that conclusion comes down in favor of one political "ideological certainty" or another. People who will laud my observations because they support their ideological views one day can be calling me every vile name in the book the next when another observation points out that a different ideological view is based on half-truths, extremely shaky evidence, or just completely at odds with observed reality. So, in general, I ignore the usual attempts to browbeat me into c…

How Freedom of Information will Change the World

Another rescue from Transhumanity.net's wholesale deletion of my articles.


So, 2012 has ended and everywhere you look, despite our having survived the “end of the world” you see pessimism, gloom, doom and negativity. No matter where you live, it seems everyone is convinced that there’s just no hope. So many people have stopped trying to do anything, while they “wait for god” or “wait for the Singularity.” Or simply wait, period. The negativity is everywhere. So, here’s one of my longwinded rambling rants, against that negativity.

So, you feel doomed, feel like the corporations have won, that nothing will ever change, or that if it does, the same old same old will make sure that you never get to share in the glorious new future? That only the rich will have immortality, that corporations will ensure that nanofactories are DRM’d, that nothing is ever free, and that the future is one in which Big Brother will control everything in one immortal Dictatorship? Trust me, I can understand y…

First You Must Question

Another preservation, since Transhumanity.net seems to have removed almost all of my articles I had there.



I’m going to insult your intelligence today.
No, seriously, I am. Because today I’m going to be talking to all of you who truly, firmly and completely think you base your world views on science, rational thinking, and a solid grasp of reality. I’m talking to those of you who claim to reject anything but that which can be empirically proven, mathematically defined, and subject to verified repeatable experiments. To those of you who believe that SCIENCE (note the emphasis) holds all the answers.
I deal with a lot of people like you. In fact, I recently wrote an article called “Against Consensus” which was deliberately targeted to draw fire from precisely those people who believe that “consensus” has any value at all in science. Today, I’m going to address those of you who rather rigidly think that “Science has all the answers.”
Don’t get me wrong. Science, as it is SUPPOSED to be pract…